this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
891 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the reelection of former President Trump would be the “end of democracy” in an interview released Saturday by The Guardian.

“It will be the end of democracy, functional democracy,” Sanders said in the interview.

The Vermont senator also said in the interview that he thinks that another round of Trump as the president will be a lot more extreme than the first.

“He’s made that clear,” Sanders said. “There’s a lot of personal bitterness, he’s a bitter man, having gone through four indictments, humiliated, he’s going to take it out on his enemies. We’ve got to explain to the American people what that means to them — what the collapse of American democracy will mean to all of us.”

Sanders’s words echo those President Biden made in a recent campaign speech during which he said that Trump’s return to the presidency would risk American democracy. The president highlighted the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol in an attempt to cement a point about Trump and other Republicans espousing a kind of extremism that was seen by the world on that day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In other words: They intentionally voted against progressive and leftist efforts.

Those people can go fuck themselves.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they voted for progressive and leftist interests, just like you did. If Bernie had won they'd have voted for him, because they're mature enough to try to make things better in reality, the best that they see it, which may be flawed. At least, that's how people I know who voted for Biden in the primary behave.

Again, if you have a game-plan for how to make the Democrats a better party, then all this that I'm saying doesn't apply. If, however, your plan is just to help the Republicans until the existing Democratic establishment just wakes up one day and decides to turn away from the corporate money that's sustained them all this time, then you're helping the Republicans.

I think this conversation has started to go in circles, so I may bow out after this bit. But that's my take on it.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, they voted for progressive and leftist interests

Buddy, your reading comprehension could use some work.

“Because he’s more likely to beat Trump; genuinely center-left candidates e.g. George McGovern or Jimmy Carter tend to get beat real bad in elections in the US, largely because our news media is so committedly right-wing.”

They voted against center-left candidates (progressives and leftists) in favor of a centerist like Biden. These people are fighting against us and I say again: They can go fuck themselves.

If Bernie had won they’d have voted for him

Yeah, after expecting progressives and leftists to carry garbage procorporate candidates over and over and over they fucking better.

I'm not voting for Biden again. Stop electing procorporate trash in the primaries.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 0 points 10 months ago

Voting for someone who (in their minds) can win the general election, as opposed to voting for someone who (in their minds) will lose to Trump, is advancing leftist interests.

Would you disagree with that?

Wait... wait. I worry what you just heard was: (Something else). What I said was: Would you disagree with that exact statement?

These people are fighting against us

Some of the people I'm thinking of have volunteered with the Democrats on behalf of were-too-leftist-to-get-elected candidates. And again, they'd vote for your candidate in the general election, because once the field is narrowed to two choices despite their efforts to advance a more leftist choice, they'd rather have the better option over the worse one, and they're responsible enough to try for the better of the remaining options (and then go back to working for something better than that in the future).

Sounds to me like you're fighting against them.