this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
3029 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59577 readers
4760 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sad thing is that even good channel are driven to do this bullshit because people do really watch those more often. How can we be such a brainless hive mind...

E.g. Marques Brownlee actually does do decent reviews.

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

had me until the last line

marques only does impressions and doesn't do reviews

the only review he has done is the iPhone 13 pro 6 months later

every other video is made with 2-3 weeks of usage(he gets device a few weeks before launch and uses beta version of software to make "reviews")

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the way consumer reviews have always worked. Short of a few exceptions, most professional reviews for any hardware are impressions. If it took 6 months to review a washing machine, it would take a lot of people to keep up. Same with phones, same with video games. It's nice when someone can give a long term review, but if every phone he reviewed took 6 months to review, he'd have 1-2 videos a year.

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

phones gets updates over months which enhance or worsens the experience of the device

eg pixel 6 got worse with updates and it didn't even get updated for 2-3 months I think and various poco phones had bad motherboard issues which only showed up after a few months

in fact, it was common for pixel series to get widespread hardware issues like green screen on pixel 2, screen not placed evenly on pixel 5 and more, even though it got good "reviews" on YouTube because they were impressions

users buy based on reviews thinking the device is good but that is just an impression

and coming to the last line, why do you need to be bombarded with review videos?
its ok if we get 1-2 device review

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

If you are wanting reviews to take 6 months, there won't be any reviews of the phone until half way through their sales cycle. I agree things change over time. I have a Pixel 5 and on release it had horrible brightness sensing problems thanks to the under screen brightness sensor, and that got a lot better after a couple of months. But it is unrealistic to expect people to wait 6 months to see if a phone might be good. That was doubley true when most phones only had 2 years of support tops.

It's a little better now, but if you aren't buying a phone when it first hits the market you are shaving time off the life of the phone, if you are like me and camp on a phone for years. Heck, for a long time cell phone carriers were selling phones who's EOL had already come, it was bad.