this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
381 points (93.8% liked)

Games

16714 readers
468 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
381
GTA 5 actor goes nuclear on AI company that made a voice chatbot of him: 'I'm not worried about being replaced... I just hate these f**kers' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 10 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/games@sh.itjust.works
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Again, using audio AI to copy a real voice is kinda dumb. Like using image AI to draw real actors, playing characters... instead of just drawing the fucking character.

This tech would let one actor do all the characters. Like how audiobooks work - except you'd get the actor's performance in the character's voice. Stephen Fry doing Snape (behave) may sound like Alan Rickman, but only if Alan Rickman is how Snape's supposed to sound.

The only reason for him to sound exactly like that is if that's what people already think he sounds like. New characters, or newly-adapted characters, can sound however you want. This technology will let anybody play them.

So hire someone good.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I could really use that for dungeon mastering; NPC voices (esp. accents) are the hardest part for me.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You don't have to be the world's most accomplished voice actor with 500 unique voices in your repertoire to be a good DM. Even if you just have a default "NPC" voice that's different than your DM-ing voice, most players are fine with that. No need to bring in bullshit AI into the game. DnD players got along fine for decades without it.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 10 months ago

I'm saying that it would be nice to enhance my voices, not that I need 500 voices to be a good DM, or that we can't get by without it.

[–] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Just because people did fine in the past doesn't mean we can't try new things to improve the experience for our players.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Real-time might be asking a lot.

So I guess, give it a year.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But robot no need production insurance or paycheck!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

If capital can make art without spending money, so can artists.

So they won't need capital.