56
Is it possible to use Google Drive reliably?
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
56 points (87.8% liked)
Linux
48008 readers
906 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
No but they won't
Do you work for them; To know?They have slowly matched googles offerings and offer linux integration. User suggestions/pressure can direct their efforts. Many of us have dumped Google for Proton. They announced desktop app for Windows and MacOS
https://proton.me/blog/proton-drive-windows
And there is a feature request started for Linux
No, I've just been a customer for several years. Development is slow and things like this are simply not a priority. They're not even a little close to matching Google.
Dev is slow because they release a good User experience, rather than buggy junk. Linux seems to be 3rd on their list but it comes eventually. Per the link you can use Windows or Mac sync now. Don't forget google had a long head start and almost unlimited devs.
The reason is irrelevant. It wasn't a criticism, just an observation.
No, they have almost no Linux support. Most things have to be done in the browser. When there is Linux support, it is extremely basic.
Cool. Doesn't help Linux users.
See point 1.
There was a long podcast interview with the CEO where he basically said Linux is and will continue to be looked over due to increased development costs and very low adoption.
Actually their pages say it is hard to find Linux devs for desktop, and that is why it is slow. And there is already a proton drive API you can use with rclone on linux.
And as far as critisim you said specifically not as good as google, so I provide a reason why. you can't then change you tact and say it wasn't critism whenvyou do a compare. It will come, things take time. You seem to keep moving goal posts here so have a good rest of your week.
I am using rclone with Linux, and works just fine. Just long term backups, but it runs the same speed (slow) as windows-to-proton.
Anyway, point being rclone works!
Yep, and some linux community will most likely pickup on development if Proton doesn't turn it into a full desktop linux app like the Windows or Mac version.
Again, the reason is irrelevant. The point is, it ain't happening.
That's not "changing tact". It's not as good as Google from a user perspective. That doesn't mean it doesn't have it's own merits. I pay for a Proton subscription rather than use a free, much more fully-featured Google one, so I obviously understand the value proposition. I also understand it's shortcomings.
I don't suppose you want to elaborate on what goal posts I've supposedly moved?
Your initial comment was "Not gonna happen since Proton is all encrypted." When I pointed out that that makes no difference--and we have Windows and Mac version (that accesses this encrypted data) then you switched to another reason. It won't end, so I have to say good bye, knowing that My Proton Vpn on linux install works, the e-mail bridge works, somebody will integrate the Proton drive API with linux because that's what the community does even if Proton doesn't release it.
It's not another reason. It's the same reason.
If it wasn't encrypted it would be trivial to spin up a local integration like Google or MS already have.
Since it is encrypted, it makes it significantly more complicated to develop. While this development may make sense on MS or Mac, it doesn't on Linux, because it requires more resources and serves a much much smaller number of users.
I've already explained all of this in the previous comments.
"Works" is right. Like I said, it's extremely basic compared to it's MS and Mac counterparts.
Notice how MS and Mac get fully-featured desktop clients and all Linux gets is a "bridge" to connect to an inbox client developed by someone else.
Linux app in beta https://lemmy.world/post/13107909
Cool thanks