I understand that the west has ridiculously high levels of propaganda against the DPRK but how do Communists argue with the fact that there is clearly some kind of family line to the leader role? (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by hotwarioinyourarea@hexbear.net to c/communism101@lemmygrad.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Shouldn't the role be "advertised" to other people as well? Why is it following the Kim family line when that seems completely against ML thought?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

yeah I think disallowing immediate family (if not more) from holding public power is something every political system newer than "divine right of kings" should do. Hardly anyone whining about north korea gives a shit that the united states went bush - clinton - bush into another clinton being the presumptive candidate and our elections are probably less legitimate than the dprk.

something something royal family something something usual decadence, two of them.

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Politics as a career should be the thing to get rid off.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023

2 points (100.0% liked)

Communism101

1366 readers

1 users here now

This is a community for those who are new to or unfamiliar with communist, socialist or simply leftist philosophy. Ask basic questions here and learn about what we stand for!

Rules:

Keep things SFW!
Keep posts and comments civil.
Don't attack someone for not knowing "enough" about communism or leftism.
Civil discussion and debate is welcome, trolling and hate speech is not.
No racism, sexism, homophobia, inciting crime/violence, etc.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

redjoker@lemmygrad.ml

FPGA@lemmygrad.ml