this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
32 points (90.0% liked)

Games

16679 readers
882 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The "Star Wars Timeline"is about as straightforward as the Zelda timeline.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The current Disney timeline is very straight forward, what you on about

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've read the books, played the games & seen the things that have been "removed" from canon, but are still referenced. The fact that you had to state "Current Disney Timeline" shows that there are multiple, and the current scatter point happens in a retcon.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

They make it pretty easy to tell you what is and isn't canon though. Anything made since Disney bought them and not under the non canon "legends" line is canon. With everything prior to Disney, other than the movies and the clone wars also going into "legends".

Also then referencing older legends stuff in new stories is just implying that those stories in some way may also have happened in this version of Star wars. But they don't make the old stuff canon, because they can't be canon because all of the old stuff was an absolute mess and constantly contradicted each other. Which is why Disney did what they did.

I take the little easter eggs about legends as like "hey, we may adapt this story into the canon at some point with a new interpretation"