this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
252 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32721 readers
304 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thiccdiccnicc@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You usually see these on fields that are co-owned or need to be accessed by several municipalities. Everybody gets their own key but can still have access to the area whenever needed.

[–] Cha0zz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t just duplicating the key achieve the same purpose or am I missing something?

[–] TheGayTramp@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

Duplicating the key removes some accountability. With this set up you can revoke access to only one person, while leaving the access in place for everyone else. If you had a single lock with six copies then a bad actor getting a copy means you’d have to replace everyone else’s keys

This also means one person can’t take their lock off and replace it with another, and therefore lock out everyone else