this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
227 points (100.0% liked)

196

16488 readers
1613 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Real talk, “pasteurize” is the stupidest most misaligned word that could have possibly been used for the process of sterilizing via heat.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 65 points 9 months ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur

It's named after the inventor of the process though. Heat things to kill bacteria.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 9 months ago

Oh that makes sense

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It should be "Pasteurize", as it's named after Louis Pasteur. And the specific process he invented dramatically increases the shelf life of milk using very high temperatures for a very short time.... Without changing the milk texture or cooking it very much.

So pasteurization is a process that sterilises did with heat. But I don't think it works on meat.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It works just fine meat. The graph is often presented in the context of sous vide cooking of meats.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yes. But that is cooking the meat, as in changing the taste and texture by denaturing proteins.

Pasteurized milk does not get cooked in the same manner.

[–] Francisco@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Pasteurized products are not sterile.

Sterilization should only be used to describe processes that leave no living microorganisms or fruitable spores behind.