710
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Amazon Told Drivers Not to Worry About In-Van Surveillance Cameras. Now Footage Is Leaking Online::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago

It’s astounding how much money they will spend to not pay and treat their employees fairly.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 22 points 1 year ago

That’s true, but Amazon pays above the national average, which itself desperately needs to rise.

[-] Stitch@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

This is a stronger indictment of the national work landscape than a boon for Amazon, who has a over 100% turnover rate…

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago

Again, I agree.

I’m not an executive, if I could raise the national average for all of us believe me I would.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Amazon pays pretty decently but it's just god awful work. I worked in a warehouse briefly and made more than I had anywhere else entry level, but sorting boxes for 9 hours straight on night shifts isn't worth it

[-] sputtersalt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

how can you have a turnover rate over 100%?

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

It's a turnover rate over time. If everyone quit and had to be replaced in a day you'd be at 100%. Anything after that is over 100% for the year.

I've seen rates of 150% bandied around for Amazon. That means replacing 12.5% of your total headcount on average monthly.

[-] sputtersalt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not great with math so please let me know if I'm understanding this right:

  1. Company has 100 employees
  2. All 100 employees quit
  3. Company gets 100 new employees as replacement

= 100% turnover rate

Then...

  1. Company has the 100 new employees
  2. 50 of the new employees quit
  3. Company gets 50 new employees as replacement

= 150% turnover rate

and so on?

[-] quicksand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It simply has to do with the number of lost/new employees in a year. So if you have 100 employees on your payroll and 100 quit over the course of a year, then you have 100% turnover. If 50, then 50/100 total employees = 50% turnover. It will be lower if less people left. Here's the link where I learned this: https://www.aihr.com/blog/how-to-calculate-employee-turnover-rate/#:~:text=How%20to%20calculate%20annual%20turnover,%3D%200.05%2C%20or%205%25.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Turnover rates are usually described annually. If a company has to replace it's whole staff twice in a year, that's a 200% annual turnover rate.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
710 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
3227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS