130
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -4 points 8 months ago

Having used a cloud gaming machine for the last couple years, provided they have sufficiently distributed datacenters, this would work out in their favor.

I'm sure manufacturing PS5 consoles is a pain, between design, manufacturing, shipping, sales, support, and all the other stuff. If they could take the same hardware and put it somewhere with climate control, redundant power, and no toddlers shoving bread into it, they could make them a lot cheaper.

Then charge by the hour and you've got a way for people to get hooked into the Sony ecosystem without dropping $500, expanding their available market. Plus the game makers don't have the expense of discs anymore. (Which sucks for us but "it's just business.")

However, like someone else said, this is a nothingburger written to get clicks, so everything I said is baloney. But I hope it was interesting baloney. Like that Lebanon Sweet Bologna. Mmm... with some Herlocher's mustard and horseradish.

[-] stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 months ago

Tell me you have no Internet data cap? Because cloud gaming will go nowhere until we go back to no ISP data caps.... (Which won't happen with the engrained cable providers)

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

True, I do have unlimited data, mostly because there's actual competition for broadband where I live. But it doesn't use that much more data than streaming video, since it's just streaming the screen of the cloud PC.

[-] thegoodyinthehoody@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I thought streaming games took more data because there was no optimization pass throughs, like Netflix can store the popular videos close to population centers and they can encode each video with knowledge of what’s coming up in its future as well as its past, where gaming videos need to be generated and encoded on the fly and could be anything

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It would still be the same amount of data at the endpoint, regardless of where they’re stored. It just costs the ISPs more for upstream bandwidth because it’s not cached in their data center.

Though a company with Sony’s reach might be able to convince ISPs to put gaming machines in the same place.

But as for the stream itself, it’s just h265 encoded video, not really different from any other video.

[-] stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 months ago

It's not the same because of fps. You're not playing those games at 24 fps.

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
130 points (85.3% liked)

Games

16403 readers
1888 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS