453
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Stand for America Fund Inc, a super PAC that supports Nikki Haley, reported on Thursday that it has raised $50.1 million in the second half of 2023 — millions more than Trump-aligned super PAC MAGA Inc., which reported over $46 million.

There are no details from these numbers yet, which were reported by the New York Times, as the Federal Election Commission filing deadline is only Jan. 31.

When it comes to MAGA Inc.'s funds, the super PAC ended the year with over $23 million in cash on hand, according to reports — and counted with over a dozen donors who contributed with $1 million or more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 40 points 9 months ago

There's no way Trump isn't going to run in November. If he get's frozen out by the GOP he'll declare himself a write in candidate, and if he's barred by SCOTUS he'll run Ivanka.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

He might be dumb enough to think the GOP can run Donald Trump Jr. In his place and not have to change the ballots.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Even Eric knows that Ivanka is the smart one.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

If Trump wants to win the election, he knows better than to put a gigantic loser like Jr on the ballot.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

So you're saying Biden in a landslide?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago

Don't jinx us.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

Has Ivanka even been seen with him since she and Jared walked away with their $2B Saudi deal?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Be fascinating to see if he would even be successful as a writing candidate, because you have to think his supporters aren't the best spellers.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That's one way to save the timeline, I guess. I'd be pretty funny if Donald lost to 2 different misspellings of his own name.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

• Trumb • Tump • Trunp

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
453 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS