Privacy

31951 readers

1105 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

776

Mozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefox (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There isn't a good app ecosystem for arm on osx either? What's your point?

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You’re incorrect. Tons of apps are native ARM on Mac now, also rosetta2 emulation is really fast. Obviously not as fast as native ARM but it surprised me.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most might be native but tell me what apps don't have an alternative on x86 and I'll agree with you.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Exclusivity isn’t the point. A healthy app ecosystem is what we’re discussing, which ARM on Mac has. It wasn’t great for 6 months or so, but it’s quite good now.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

??? No the whole discussion on this has been how people can't get out of the ecosystem. Which I've provided multiple ways to get out of it. There is really zero point to even bring up ARM MacBooks, because as you have said the ecosystem isn't exclusive.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There isn't a good app ecosystem for arm on osx either? What's your point?

Did you forget what you said? This is what I’m responding to.

macOS (not osX for many years now) has a healthy app ecosystem, unlike windows for ARM.

And you can load Linux and Windows on all Mac's.

just install windows

My point is “install Windows” isn’t a valid option for anyone with an ARM Mac, so suggesting it is silly. Mac hasn’t made an x86 computer in a couple years.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Did you miss the part where I said sell it and buy a x86 machine and have money left over?

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm not the parent commenter, but Apple Silicon has much wider app support than ARM on Windows. There's also Rosetta, which works alright, I suppose. Not spectacularly and usually not anywhere near native performance but it's at least okay.