UK's flagship nuclear plant could cost up to $59 billion, developer says (apnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Weird how anything that can possibly reduce fossil fuel usage is always too expensive

That's not true. Wind and solar are often cheaper than fossil fuels and the prices are still going down.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

Sure but they can't replace fossil fuels. Every single renewable energy scheme that a government invests int has Natural Gas plants that are running 24/7 to handle peak demand and smooth out the supply curve of solar/wind.

[-] sizzler@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Either they run to smooth out the curve OR they run 24/7. Not both.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They can't be kept on cold standby, so they aren't running at 100% capacity 24/7, but they do have to run.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024

75 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32082 readers

808 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

jackmarxist@lemmy.ml

zephyreks@lemmy.ml

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml