this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
843 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What you call an expat is a temporary immigrant. "Expats" fill immigration forms in their country of migration, not expatriation forms. Politicians pass laws that govern immigration, not expatriation.

That word is meant to differentiate rich (and white, often) workers from the poor, because "immigrant" has a negative connotation. That's why I take issue with it.

The truth is, the poor might be temporary migrants too (cf Pakistanis in Dubai). The media still uses the word migrants for those. We don't know if they're "expats" or not, we just assume because they're not rich or white enough.

Quick disclaimer here: I'm not saying you are racist for using the word. I just wanted to explain why I react so strongly when I hear it.

[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I did point out that I would not use the word myself, which was entirely for that reason.

[–] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

That's true, sorry!