42
submitted 9 months ago by anarchy79@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Got this from (allegedly) Twitter

So right off the bat I can tell for sure that it ain't me trying to log on to that shite, but it doesn't leave me much choice either now does it?

(red blotches mine, for privacy, and dramatic effect)

(solve the captchas to win a free tshirt!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 44 points 9 months ago

Speaking as a security professional, this is pretty standard practice for a solid user experience. I’m rather surprised someone in a privacy community would take umbrage at this because security and privacy are closely linked. When someone attempts to steal your account, do you not want an alert?

The easiest way to get rid of this email is to delete your Twitter account.

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 26 points 9 months ago

The point of contention here is not that OP doesn't like this kind of verification, but that he believes that Twitter is making up the sign in attempt to get OP to actually log in and report higher usage metrics in Q3.

I don't think OP opposes 2FA, at least not from the info he posted.

[-] driving_crooner 13 points 9 months ago

There's no way a campaign like this is going to growth users use metrics in a significant way to cheat a quarterly report

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

I agree, I'm just explaining OP's logic

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

From a conspiracy standpoint, so what?

  • Numbers for the console that tracks these things go up, making the security features trend higher internally. Net win for user security.
  • Total logins goes up. This is a meaningless metric that doesn’t affect value to anyone but the most ignorant shareholder. Nothing changes for Twitter.
  • Links clicked through Twitter’s tracker goes up. Since the target and originator is a single user, this increases nothing. From a shareholder perspective, again, a worthless metric.
  • Twitter gains session data. Unless the user deletes Twitter while logging in, this is an intentional choice by the user to use the platform and give that data. Possible win for Twitter but it’s a win the user agreed to because their data is the product.

“Numbers go up” doesn’t really work here. Fidelity isn’t going to upgrade Twitter’s value from any of this. Even if we assume it’s a drummed up attempt, it gains Twitter nothing we don’t agree to give Twitter by using the platform.

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

I totally agree, just explained OP's point

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
42 points (73.9% liked)

Privacy

31847 readers
123 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS