this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
66 points (97.1% liked)

Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence

2879 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence!

We are a community dedicated to forwarding the availability and access to:

Free Open Source Artificial Intelligence (F.O.S.A.I.)

More AI Communities

LLM Leaderboards

Developer Resources

GitHub Projects

FOSAI Time Capsule

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brcht@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I have tried the version available at hugginchat and it's almost gpt4 level for programming tasks but not so much for general knowledge

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

What’s the best overall in your opinion for programming tasks?

I’ve had pretty flawless experience with the free ChatGPT3.5 for simple scripts but don’t generally stray beyond that.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 9 months ago

I've had reasonably good results with deepseek 6.7b

It struggles and hallucinates once you get into more niche languages, but it'll spit out a snake in Python or write file io functions pretty well - I've used it to read/write huge json in a buffer with good results.

I haven't tried gpt4, but compared to 3.5 it's pretty great

[–] Brcht@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I have gpt4 with copilot at work so i mostly use that, it is pretty good for programming, you see its limitations when you start relying on it a lot on autocompletions, maybe because the code itself is not too coherent and gpt gets confused

Maybe chat tasks are simpler because it writes the whole thing from scratch, though I mostly ask it for limited functionalities, eg write a function that takes x and returns y or use a certain ORM to change a value.

I would suggest you try both gpt 3.5 and the free huggingface minstral 7b version (you can probably run it on pc too, it's not huge) for programming tasks and see for yourself. For general knowledge though, gpt wins hands down over minsral 7b

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I can't find miqu-1-70b in huggingchat. Do I need to enable anything special anywhere?

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Thats the model, but how do I get it into huggingchat? https://huggingface.co/chat/

Edit: thanks for the suggestion though. 🙂

[–] Brcht@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah only have the 7b it seems on huggingchat, that's the one I was talking about.

Given how good the 7b I wouldn't be surprised if the 70b is better than gpt4 for programming-related chat.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Do you know if there are any plans to quantize it? I'd love to test it, but my 3090 can't handle 70b models without quantization, unfortunately.

[–] midnight@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There are quantized versions on hugging face. There's a q2 version, but idk how well that performs

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Only quantized versions of the model were leaked. If you see any unquantized version of it then it's something which was recreated from these, and not the original model. People have also requanted it from GGUF to EXL2 and probably other formats too.