570
‘I wasn’t allowed to get the healthcare I needed’: the women suing Tennessee for being denied abortions
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
570 points (98.6% liked)
News
23406 readers
3048 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is like "is dating women gay?"
"Are oppressive laws passed by Republicans the Democrats fault?"
When they have the power to change it and don't?
Absolutely.
When have the Democrats had a 2/3 majority necessary to bring a Constitutional Amendment to vote?
Because that's the only legal path to over riding the Supreme Court's ruling.
Under Obama, and no, that's not their only path.
They could have ended the filibuster forever any time they had a simple majority.
So what do you propose? Let the Republicans be in charge?
Really, really listen to what you're saying.
I propose we all vote for a third party instead.
I'm reading what you are saying. What you said is because Democrats have never the had power to make the changes you want, you will put Republicans in charge.
Democrats had the power and chose not to wield it. They love the Jim Crow Filibuster too much.
No, because I'm not a partisan who votes Republican or Democrat.
For me, voting records matter. That's why I vote third party. You're the one voting for party no matter what they do.
Democrats never had the power to do what you wanted them to do. So you enable Republicans to do worse.
bOtH sIdEs
So you want the Republicans to be in charge.
If you want any viable third party, you need to be pushing for election reform at the state/local level. I'd prefer the Star system, but even ranked choice would be better than FPTP. The system was designed to be difficult to change at the federal level, but easy to change at the local level.
No. In fact, I've said otherwise several times in this thread.
Further, by voting for do-nothing Democrats, you're doing far more to help Republicans than I am.
This is the voting map of the USA.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2020_United_States_presidential_election_results_map_by_county.svg
Voting is by county at the local level and by state at the national. It doesn't matter that it isn't democratic. It is the law as it exists. THE POPULATION DOES NOT MATTER.
Claiming Democrats are do nothing is like blaming Blacks for being a minority.
Uh huh...
Do you have any realistic suggestions?
...but they don't have the power to change it? Mainly because people keep voting for Republicans come rain or shine, vote for Democrats when the syzzergy of planets is correct and the tea leaves are vibing and they didn't see a green car on voting day, and vote for a 3rd party literally never even if it would kill them not to.
And I say this as someone who desperately wishes the 3rd party option was half as good as the UK's options.
You say this as someone who doesn't care about outcomes, because all you've seen for the last 40 years is gradual, but inevitable conservative outcomes, and you're going to pretend voting Democrat changes that anyway.