this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
361 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32288 readers
1057 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Cubic feet would be better, especially as taller vehicles are more dangerous to pedestrians.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Let's ban archaic units like feet and stick with cubic meter.

Plus there are vans, so the more accurate metric would be a cubic meter per passenger.

[–] IndefiniteBen@leminal.space 1 points 9 months ago

Oh yeah I'd prefer metric, but I was just being consistent with the thread, as the actual units are somewhat beside my point.

Now to find why I didn't get a notification for this reply...

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Ah yeah, that's more accurate to what I was thinking

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Length × Width × Hood Height then?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Yeah, and just register it in a database. Like how I gotta pay $100 more in vehicle registration because my car's 50 fucking kg above the lower bracket. People with F350s can pay triple what I do. No, sextuple! Because they can't fit in just one park. Parking inspector puts in the number plate and machine calculates the rest.

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That's how we get double decker cars lol