359
submitted 7 months ago by joojmachine@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Lastly, although free alternatives are often technically superior to their closed-source competitors, at the end of the day

I am 100% in agreement with you here. While I'm not by any means a Libertarian, I prefer MIT and BSD licenses because they are truely free. The GPL is not: it removes freedoms. Now, you argue that limiting freedom can be a net good - we limit the freedom to rape and murder, and that's good. I don't agree that the freedoms the GPL removes are equivalent, and can indeed be harmful.

I don't mind others using the GPL, but I won't.

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

We can agree to disagree on the freedom point. The only "freedom" I see being taken away with the GPL is the removing of the freedom of other people.

I don't mind the MIT/BSD licenses, but I won't use them. We can agree on that.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
359 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

47371 readers
1075 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS