Since he's already dead, there can't be any new developments or updates. He died, that's the end of the story, I don't need new sources to know he's still dead.

My point is kind of that AI's don't have a concept of time and even less of death. But primarily I just thought this reaction is funny.

[–] Gambler@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I kinda read the phrasing as there is no more news about him that would be relevant without a more specific query not is he alive again.

I’d more think it’s saying “he wasn’t posthumously given another Grammy this year that I know about”

[–] Risus_Nex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I would argue that, even tho it's not how a human would respond, it's correct nevertheless. Because there could be news about him still. Maybe someone found out his grave is empty or he faked his death or there is a new song out from him, like with Linkin Park, where they released a "new" song with Chester singing.

[–] Flicsmo@rammy.site 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dunno, it makes sense to me. New information or music releases can come out after someone's death, and you asked what he's been up to recently, not if/when he had died

[–] WaLLy3K@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

It was asked what "he", as a person, was up to recently. Not "What's the latest news on Michael Jackson?" as a topic.

That's the mistake that ChatGPT made in its response.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not a native speaker but don't being up to something imply that he is actively doing or planning something? I didn't asked if there were news about him.

[–] scribs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

it is wondering why you asked then lol