271
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Teachers will be forced to tell parents that their child is questioning their gender even if the young person objects under new guidance for schools in England, the equalities minister has indicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

You trying to lump personal identity in with things that can lead to jail or teenage pregnancy is very telling.

Yes, it's called 'behavior.'

The government forces parents to send our kids to government institutions for 'education' and if we want to know what's going on they tell us to shut up? Nah, family, I don't buy into that philosophy.

Should teachers also report when your child makes friends with a student of a different race or religion?

Did you not parent teacher meetings where they talk about how you're doing in school and who you're hanging out with?

You keep referring to teachers ‘making decisions about the child’ but nothing is being ‘decided’ by teachers here.

The teachers are deciding to withhold information about how my kid behaves in a government forced institution. The teachers should be working with parents, not fighting against them.

It’s the children who are deciding this for themselves because they’re also people with autonomy.

How much autonomy? If they can decide for themselves, why shouldn't we remove the drinking age? Smoking age? military age? They're people with autonomy, right? If a kid gets caught drinking, their parents deal with it, not the kid.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, it’s called ‘behavior.’

What a nonsense, meaningless reply. This sounds like a response from someone who lacks critical thinking skills and doesn't understand the difference between behavior and identity.

The government forces parents to send our kids to government institutions for ‘education’ and if we want to know what’s going on they tell us to shut up?

This makes you sound unhinged. Who is 'they' and when did 'they' tell you to shut up?

Did you not parent teacher meetings where they talk about how you’re doing in school and who you’re hanging out with?

Yes, and that's completely irrelevant to the discussion. Parent teacher conferences don't consist of the teacher listing the race, religion or ethnicity of the students I/my child hang out with, nor is there a specific mandate for them to do so.

Since you avoided my question, I'll ask you again: Should teachers also report when your child makes friends with a student of a different race or religion? Why or why not and if not, how is that any different from this? Are you capable of responding to this question or do you find it too challenging?

The teachers are deciding to withhold information about how my kid behaves in a government forced institution.

Are they? Or maybe they're just minding their own business when it comes to matters that don't involve education or risky/harmful behavior. If you want to know about your kid's behavior, why are you asking their teacher instead of them? You complain about 'forced government institutions' yet in the next breath demand they be the sole conduit into your child's life.

The teachers should be working with parents, not fighting against them.

Why would anyone in their right mind want to work with someone who refers to them as a "servant" of theirs and claims they work for a "forced government institution" that's indoctrinating children? How are they "fighting against you" here?

How much autonomy? If they can decide for themselves, why shouldn’t we remove the drinking age? Smoking age? military age? They’re people with autonomy, right? If a kid gets caught drinking, their parents deal with it, not the kid.

What do any of these things have to do with a person determining their own identity just as every other autonomous human has done for millennia?

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What a nonsense, meaningless reply. This sounds like a response from someone who lacks critical thinking skills and doesn’t understand the difference between behavior and identity.

Parents are forced to send their kids to government agents at the threat of taking the kids away. The least they can do is being transparent with my kids behavior, if little jimmy wants everyone to call him Laquisha, that falls under behavior.

This makes you sound unhinged. Who is ‘they’ and when did ‘they’ tell you to shut up?

What's unhinged about it? My local school boards.

Yes, and that’s completely irrelevant to the discussion.

No it's not, teachers have been expected to let parents know what their kids are up to and how they're doing socially, emotionally and with their studies. The fact you are trying to have teachers keep these things from parents is more telling about you.

Parent teacher conferences don’t consist of the teacher listing the race, religion or ethnicity of the students I/my child hang out with, nor is there a specific mandate for them to do so.

You made up this scenario and are arguing against it. That's weird.

Are they? Or maybe they’re just minding their own business when it comes to matters that don’t involve education or risky/harmful behavior.

If a kid has cancer should the nurses not tell the parents? Is transitioning not a very hard emotionally and mentally situation to be in? pre-transition, the suicide rate attempt is over 40%, how would you feel if your kid attempted suicide and you couldn't help because the teacher kept it a secret?

Why would anyone in their right mind want to work with someone who refers to them as a “servant”

LOL, I say public servant, and the fact you try to pervert my argument and equate it with 'servant' is dishonest and disgusting. Every individual employed by the government is supposed to serve the tax payers.

You complain about ‘forced government institutions’ yet in the next breath demand they be the sole conduit into your child’s life.

I didn't complain it's a forced government institution, I said what it was. I don't demand I be the sole conduit, I demand that the teachers tell me what my kids are up to during their forced institutionalization. I know it may be odd that someone paying for the school, paying for the new gym, property taxes teachers salaries and their supplies might want to know how my kids are doing, but I think the governments job should always include transparency to those that they are serving.

What do any of these things have to do with a person determining their own identity just as every other autonomous human has done for millennia?

You said that kids have autonomy. 13 year olds should be able to buy cigarettes, booze, get tattoos, right? Is there a reason we don't allow them to?

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
271 points (94.7% liked)

News

22895 readers
3879 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS