this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)

Fediverse

17717 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
18
Decent Decentralisation (hachyderm.io)
submitted 9 months ago by maegul@hachyderm.io to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Decent Decentralisation

https://berjon.com/decent-imaginaries/

Good counter to the focus on protocols.

> a protocol needs to achieve two things: it needs to prevent the accumulation of power imbalances between parties … and it needs to make it easy for users to cooperate in building the the rules they want for how the protocol's operation affects them … the success of decentralisation and … of a democratic digital world **rides not only on liberation but also on organising**.

@fediverse

By @robin

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otl@hachyderm.io 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Failed attempt at decentralisation? Is this referring to the popularity of GitHub?

@astrojuanlu @maegul @fediverse

[–] astrojuanlu@social.juanlu.space 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

@otl @maegul @fediverse Yes, find the full article at the top of the thread

[–] otl@hachyderm.io 1 points 9 months ago

Ah sorry yes I read the article, was just checking I understood the comment.
The workflows enabled by git that were painful with, say, Subversion or CVS, are significant. The overwhelming popularity of GitHub is regretful in the sense there is authority captured there, but the development of the tech (DVCS) means that GitHub is not *as* critical as before. For me this is something to celebrate!

Perfect? No way. Failure? Seems over-the-top.
@astrojuanlu @maegul @fediverse