Formula 1

9059 readers

38 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location	Date
🇺🇸 United States	21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Photographer@lemmy.world

wes@lemmy.world

bwoah@lemmy.world

[Tobi Grüner] FIA is trying to close budget cap loopholes. We explain, how R&D and production costs can be removed from the books using "external" companies and how supercar projects could be misused (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by bwoah@lemmy.world to c/formula1@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Link to article: https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/formel-1/f1-problem-hypercars-entwicklung-red-bull-rb17-aston-martin-valkyrie/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Weird, because on the other hand the regulations go more towards what's standard in road cars. I thought that's why we lose the MGU-H.

So following that logic, Mercedes would have to include all of their road car engine development cost in their F1 budget cap? Doesn't make much sense.