Technology

59296 readers

4282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Apple Vision Pro Could Take Four Generations to Reach 'Ideal Form' (www.macrumors.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apple Vision Pro Could Take Four Generations to Reach 'Ideal Form'::Realizing the Apple Vision Pro headset's "ideal form" could take four successive generations of the device, some people in Apple's...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So it's a gimmick for rich and/or stupid people, which we knew anyways.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s one way to view it.

On the other hand, it’s a first product in a new line for Apple who have an idealised notion of what they want it to achieve, but realise the technological limitations that exist before significant R&D is carried out. The first gen of any tech sucks in comparison to what comes later.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think the marketing for this thing misleads people on the technical limitations.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it’s weird because I distinctly remember them touting it as a dev kit at the launch event last year, yet there’s nothing at all about that on the website now.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah just like smart phones.

[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes and no, smartphone where affordable for more people than the vision pro. Also they solved real problem. In the case of the apple iphone, it was a combination of a lot of tools into one small device so that was nice. The apple vision is just a different VR headset marketed as 10x the price of a meta headset.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They weren't originally and they didn't solve a problem. They added unneeded features to a communication device.

[–] hightime@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I think that was the iPad.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Cars didn’t “solve a real problem” at first either.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I find it fascinating how much advertising they pushed on release.

I am not an apple person so I had no idea about it, but on that day I saw it in a there different places. First two I understand: Lemmy post, an ad on some website, but most amazing one was on my kid's YouTube, started playing Marques Brownlee review after alphablocks episode. Like WTF? I don't watch anything about Apple, don't watch his reviews, but somewhat YouTube though that it was most relevant video for the content that was watched.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That has nothing to do with Apple. Marques Brownlee pulls millions of viewers, and YouTube doesn't suggest based on your watch history anymore, they suggest based on what keeps people watching.

And I don't think I remember hardly any videos where Marques is sponsored by the company who makes the product he's reviewing.