60
Palworld down 1.3m players in Steam’s biggest-ever two-week drop
(www.pcgamesn.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
60 points (71.4% liked)
Games
16645 readers
673 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So a lot of people finished the game and are now playing something else.
It's a real shocker, I guess that means that this game without MTX or subscription service is dead. /s
There is nothing in the article about the game being dead, in fact it says it explicitly assumes that it will have respectable numbers once the dust settles.
It's like you made up a reason why the article is wrong about something that it didnt even claim.
You missed the '/s' for sarcasm, didn't you?
It's absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
The best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh?
/s
I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn't implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
i can’t believe it matters this much to you
I would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
🙄
Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
Again, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don't understand the sarcasm.
i mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you.
but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.
All I did is point out why the comment is incorrect. The only one whining about sarcasm here is you.
🤦♂️