149
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by ebits21@lemmy.ca to c/python@programming.dev

Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vast_Emptiness@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah if you really care about FOSS you should use GPL and not MIT BDS and a multiple license. Because at the end of the day the code can became close source in just a second. That is the point of GPL and the Foss. I am willing to pay with money because I can. But I am not willing to pay with trust.

[-] thtroyer@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

What? The GPL would have offered no more protection for this exact scenario than the LGPL (or any other license for that matter).

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
149 points (98.7% liked)

Python

6233 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

October 2023

November 2023

PastJuly 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS