this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
107 points (98.2% liked)

Games

32470 readers
1258 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 79 points 8 months ago (4 children)

There's nothing stopping game companies from selling through multiple storefronts, or even direct to customer with Steam's cut removed.

The fact is, players are happy to pay a premium so that the games live in their steam library, are downloaded via Steam's delivery network, and integrate with steam features.

Steam is not anti-competitive, it's just good.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

100% accurate. Hell, it doesn't even feel like paying a premium when the user cost is the same or lower than in stores the majority of the time.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Seems like the majority of time buying "in store" just gets you a code to use for a digital storefront anyway.

Gaming on the PC around the 90s-2000s was pretty rough. I remember installing a game from a CD, typing the key on the back of the CD, and installation failed because I needed different sound drivers or something. I remember most games on my janky PC would be a gamble if it worked or not, even if it met minimum specs.

I remember still facing that issue in around 2010s even with Steam, and then seeing how slick installing apps were on the iPhone and it just "worked", and wishing PC games were as simple.

PC gaming is great now. It's been a long time coming.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The fact is, players are happy to pay a premium so that the games live in their steam library

i don't think you can make a statement like that, that is so untested. If capcom were to start selling games at $70 on steam, and $50 on capcom.com things might be different, we can't really say.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

We've seen games sold on Epic for less, and people wait to buy them until they're on Steam. I do it myself, even.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Exactly. Steam provides a service to these companies (a pipeline to customers) and they don’t want to pay.

They are free to make their own, like epic, ubisoft, origin, etc. have, and I am free to continue to use Steam, which I prefer because it provides a service and it works and I feel is a superior product.

[–] Maestro@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Me too. I will not spend a single cent on Epic, but I'll happily buy Steam games.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Another thing is the infrastructure that Steam provides to get the games to the users and support them costs money. If Capcom wants to build the infrastructure themselves it will cost them more. they will have to charge $100 (exaggeration) and they will only be serving Capcom games.