this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
875 points (98.8% liked)

xkcd

8792 readers
162 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2897

Alt text:

When Pope Gregory XIII briefly shortened the light-year in 1582, it led to navigational chaos and the loss of several Papal starships.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly, Wikipedia says they actually did base it on 365.25 instead of the actual 365.2425, so you’re technically right.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that is what Wikipedia says. Whatever one's thoughts on Wikipedia, I'm pretty sure it is getting this right.

365.25 is what you get if you have leap years every four years with no exceptions. This is what was done in the Julian calendar which was used in the Christian world some centuries ago (how long exactly depends on what part of the Christian world).

365.2425 is the average year length in the Gregorian calendar which we use (where leap years are 1592, 1596, 1600, 1604, 1608, ... 1692, 1696, 1704, 1708, ..., 1792, 1796, 1704, 1708, ..., 1892, 1896, 1904, 1908, ... 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, ..., 2092, 2096, 2104, 2108, ...).

The actual average solar year is better approximated by the latter than the former, but it is still slightly off.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This seems pretty definitive to me:

As defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the light-year is the product of the Julian year (365.25 days, as opposed to the 365.2425-day Gregorian year or the 365.24219-day Tropical year that both approximate) and the speed of light (299792458 m/s).

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That is pretty much what I said. I was irritated by your wording "the actual 365.2425", which is just another approximation of the "actual" solar year.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 1 points 8 months ago

Ah, gotcha, yeah fair enough, I could have said “more accurate”