206
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
206 points (98.1% liked)
politics
18888 readers
3394 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I assume the ruling was "embyos are and always have been children". Wonder if there isn't any malicious compliance options for people who's treatments have stopped?
Can't think of anything off the top of my head, but the ruling was insane so there has to be some sort of insane tort someone can come up with
Claim all of your frozen embryos as dependents
And just keep them frozen indefinitely. "I see you've been claiming your... children... as dependents for the past..." checks notes "...38 years. How old are they now?" "Oh, they're approximately -9 months old."
What about women who don't have any embryos stored, but have functioning ovaries? They should be claiming about 6 million dependents, right?
This is the obvious one, but my brain keeps trying to think of something much more evil-chaotic and accelerationist.
Like, suing the clinic that stopped treatments for kidnapping. Or demanding visitation
What people aren't getting is that the ruling is actually entirely consistent with right wing logic. If you are opposed to Plan B pills because they prevent fertilization from occuring, then IVF is essentially mass murder. More stories like this are going to be coming down the pipe pretty soon.
They didn't really have any choice, really, if they want to ban abortions.
The only way to ban abortions is to call it murder by declaring the embryo a human being instead of a clump of cells.
Now by doing that, how to you say an embryo in the womb is a human being but an embryo outside of the womb is not?
They trapped themselves trying to accomplish an agenda that has nothing to do with science or logic.