this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
319 points (87.2% liked)

Technology

62691 readers
2980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report from plagiarism detector Copyleaks found that 60% of OpenAI's GPT-3.5 outputs contained some form of plagiarism.

Why it matters: Content creators from authors and songwriters to The New York Times are arguing in court that generative AI trained on copyrighted material ends up spitting out exact copies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prex@aussie.zone 8 points 11 months ago (6 children)

A genuine question: How well do chatgpt & others add citations if asked?

[–] madis@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

ChatGPT itself doesn't know where it got the info from, so it makes up links and names - it's a language model, not a search engine.

On the other hand, if you manage to find a reputable source and give it relevant metadata, it can format a nice citation for you, saving you time on that instead.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Badly. This burns my laziest students every semester. Chatgpt just adds nonsense citations.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft's copilot adds them, it's why I prefer to use it.

[–] TheChurn@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Copilot is GPT under the hood, it just starts with a search step that finds (hopefully) relevant content and then passes that to GPT for summarization.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I know, but gpt doesn't do it, so I won't use it.

[–] BattleGrown@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

There is custom gpts for that. ScholarAI and Consensus are OK.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It depends on how they're using it behind the scenes. Chatbots like ChatGPT can't cite sources, because they are just generating text on the fly. However, some approaches (if links/sources are provided) use an approach called Rag (Retrevial Augmented Generation). This approach uses similarity in search terms to find sources first, then uses the sources to augment/generate its answer.

That being said there are pros and cons to both approaches.

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Perplexity AI includes citations every time.