this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
1111 points (97.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21249 readers
1626 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1111
    Why can't I just buy it without being charged for preinstalled spyware? (lemmy.world)
    submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by TimeNaan@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    Image description:

    Shopping for a laptop as a Linux user:

    Screenshot from the Simpsons where Otto is talking to Marge and Homer standing next to a window in their house with a caption "Oh wow, windows!... I don't think I can afford this place."

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] dan@upvote.au 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    These days it's not uncommon to have a powerful GPU just for AI acceleration.

    [–] Aux@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Or for photo editing. Or video editing. Or CAD work. Or a lot more stuff.

    [–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Are modern iGPUs not powerful enough for these tasks? The UHD 770 is pretty powerful, especially for video encoding/decoding (it can transcode 8+ 4K streams simultaneously)

    [–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

    For photo editing, I suspect it should be more than enough. For video editing, a beefy graphics card can make the render/encode significantly faster, though as I don't dabble with that, I can't tell how much of a speed improvement it'd be from an integrated intel vs. anything equivalent or stronger than a GTX1650

    [–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

    Could be a matter of CUDA-specific optimisations in the software. Also, an iGPU will share ram with the CPU so while it looks good on paper, memory access and (availability) will vary

    [–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    iGPUs are pretty useless for the most part.

    1. Shared memory. Regular DDR is high latency high throuput. GDDR is low latency low throuput. Not only you're sharing memory with other apps, you're also penalising yourself in terms of performance.
    2. iGPUs are very slow at computation. Yes, they have codecs built-in, but if you want to run custom math they are not much better than running it on CPU.
    3. CUDA is not available. OpenCL is, but some apps are locked to CUDA.
    4. Old GTX 1080 is 5.5 times faster than brand new Iris Xe at computation. RTX 4080 is like 3x times faster than GTX 1080. That's an order of magnitude difference between modern GPU and modern iGPU.
    [–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 8 months ago

    That makes sense. Thanks.