129
submitted 8 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de

The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term "steak" on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] absquatulate@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago

What a strange thing to be pedantic about

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 49 points 8 months ago

Meat industry lobbyists + corruption = stupid shit

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 42 points 8 months ago

Oh we're good at this. In the whole EU it's not allowed to print 'milk' or 'cheese' on something that doesn't contain actual animal's milk. Want to sell soy milk? Ok but don't call it that way...

[-] Johandea@feddit.nu 37 points 8 months ago

Except for coconut milk, because reasons.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago
[-] exocrinous@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

Appeal to tradition fallacy

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 34 points 8 months ago

It's weird, since "milk" in English has included plant milk longer than the taxonomic definition of a "mammal" has existed.

[-] ian@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We're not allowed to call part of the night sky, the Milky Way any more.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It actually is allowed for German "Scheuermilch" ("scouring cream", which is a cleaning detergent, literal translation: "scrubbing milk").

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 15 points 8 months ago

The law only addresses agricultural products but yeah there are exceptions for products that were traditional before the law was passed

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2010/791/oj

[-] ian@feddit.uk 7 points 8 months ago

Oh hell. I've been drinking Scheuermilch! I thought it was a bit crunchy

[-] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

At least, your teeth or what's left of them is pretty white.

[-] voodoocode@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

And we had this minister for transport Scheuer...

[-] trollercoaster@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

But his name doesn't come from Scheuermilch, it's rather an abbreviation of "bescheuert" - bonkers.

[-] skele_tron@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago

Germany has a whole line of not milks, almost chicken, like chicken, thun visch and i can almost be certain i saw mjolk and moloko somehwere. I always chuckle a bit when i see it.

[-] anzich@feddit.de 17 points 8 months ago
[-] Anekdoteles@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

Smells a little fishy, I assume

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

More than a little...

[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I understand what you were talking about until you got past like chicken lol

[-] muelltonne@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago

I can tell you a little about how Germany does this and I think the rest of the EU & France should be similar. There is a government body defining what specific foods are and if your food doesn't match that, you can't name it like the food in question. And that does make sense - butter has to be made from milk and not some palm oil mixed together by shady businesses and milk has to come from an animal and can't be water & white paint.

This does make sense and really protects the consumer. It does - however - really run into problems when dealing with those vegetarian meat replacements. It would make sense to sell a "vegetarian ham", but ham has an exact, legal definition and part of that definition is that ham has to contain meat.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 16 points 8 months ago

So cocoa butter, peanut butter, and other nut butters are out.

It's dumb. It's not about protecting consumers, it's about protecting corporate interests.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Cocoa and peanut butter got grandfathered in. If they were to be introduced to the EU market today you'd see them called cocoa fat and peanut creme.

[-] exocrinous@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

Appeal to tradition fallacy

[-] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I find it helpful to have the thing being imitated as part of the name, but not the full name. It makes for an easy way to know what the taste and texture should be and how it can be used in cooking. My kid developed a dairy allergy recently and vegan butter in particular is so easy to substitute in old favorite recipes without changing the flavor much or cooking method. As for meat imitations, a “vegetarian steak” (or ham) label conveys a lot about the texture, moisture, saltiness, and cooking techniques you can expect to use while a generic name such as “plant protein block” leaves you much more clueless as to what the texture and cooking method is meant to be for that item. I don’t think it should be legal to sell plant substitutes as only “steak “ or “butter”, but calling it “plant steak” or “plant butter” is way more straightforward and easy to fit on a label than a lengthy description of “plant patty with a fibrous, chewy texture and savory flavor resembling steak.”

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

while a generic name such as “plant protein block”

"vegan grill patty". German actually had a word specifically for this kind of stuff for ages, goes back to Max Bircher. The man had some sense and didn't try to call it "Gemüsefrikadelle".

[-] trollercoaster@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And that does make sense - butter has to be made from milk

cries in coal butter

[-] occhineri@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

A milk is what I mix with my cereal, pour in my coffee, use in a pancake mixture and so on. I can't see any logic behind limiting this to animal products other than a political agenda.

[-] exocrinous@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

butter has to be made from milk and not some palm oil mixed together by shady businesses and milk has to come from an animal and can't be water & white paint.

No it doesn't. I used plant butter and plant milk in all my recipes and it was fine.

[-] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Sorry you are saying you can't call something that is not cheese 'cheese'? Preposterous.

[-] EyIchFragDochNur@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

Well to be precise you're not allowed to label any agricultural product cheese that wasn't made of milk.

There are only some exceptions for traditional things like Leberkäse

[-] exocrinous@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Cheese is what comes from under my girlfriend's foreskin and I am OUTRAGED that bad-faith farmers are selling rotten cow's milk under the name cheese.

/uj words have multiple definitions, genius

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It's almost as if words should mean something. Now do milk vs juice.

load more comments (24 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
129 points (95.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS