this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
121 points (97.6% liked)

Gaming

20015 readers
954 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They make 5 billion a year, thats less than 2.5% of the money they make every year, it's a rounding error to make the spreadsheets look real good to the money lenders .

My company just let me go with a 6 figure package (x amount of pay + stocks). They could have easily kept me there for another year, but that's not as good for the spreadsheets.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I understand that, but still, the decision is a net negative. They are merely acting based on short-sighted insights.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah that was kinda my point. All that matters is what the spreadsheet looks like now. It would have probably been a net positive to keep me given they are only going to grow and spend a fortune on hiring and new stocks. That's a different spreadsheet though, I also live in a country where it's expensive to fire full time employees collectively, so it's not like they are paying these kinds of sums for everyone. It's pretty cheap to make things look good on paper.

[–] rasakaf679@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, their whole goal is to look good on papers and stock market. Not to grow as actual company. They would rather cripple themselves than to strengthen themselves by slow growth...

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

Short term gains are king for stock value.