this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

884 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers

3071 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

884

Privacy rule (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 8 months ago by GregorTacTac@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you think it's wise to give civilians unrestricted access to military intelligence, and allow them to hand that over to hostile foreign governments?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They were clearly talking about the politicians being he correct target of unrestricted information access and not the state itself

Likely for the obvious reason your alluding to here

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but that's not what OP was talking about.