this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
113 points (99.1% liked)

Biodiversity

1378 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to c/Biodiversity @ Mander.xyz!

A community about the variety of life on Earth at all levels; including plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

2023-06-16: We invite our users to contribute resources for the sidebar.

2023-06-15: Looking for mods!



About

Biodiversity is a term used to describe the enormous variety of life on Earth. It can be used more specifically to refer to all of the species in one region or ecosystem. Biodiversity refers to every living thing, including plants, bacteria, animals, and humans. Scientists have estimated that there are around 8.7 million species of plants and animals in existence. However, only around 1.2 million species have been identified and described so far, most of which are insects. This means that millions of other organisms remain a complete mystery.

Over generations, all of the species that are currently alive today have evolved unique traits that make them distinct from other species. These differences are what scientists use to tell one species from another. Organisms that have evolved to be so different from one another that they can no longer reproduce with each other are considered different species. All organisms that can reproduce with each other fall into one species. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Quick Links

Resources



Bypass Paywalls



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes



Find us on Reddit!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Headlines like that are why people don't understand evolution and naysayers come along, "Thought evolution took millions of years?!"

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You'd think it'd be the opposite? "The wolves who were most resistant to cancer were the ones who passed on their genetics" seems like a pretty easy thing to understand

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The mention genetic changes, but didn’t mention any gene names. I would have been interested to see something like TP53 duplications but there’s no way enough time would have passed for that to occur. It’s not super clear whether the population changes reflect a bottleneck or specific, advantageous mutations to cancer resistance.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You'd want to look at the actual paper or at least a more science focused report on it for information like that.

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I would except it doesn’t appear to be published yet, the article mentions the data was from a conference presentation.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

What is it if not evolution? These aren't changes in individual wolves, but the local population over generations.