World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Rural America is better than a lot of places in the world.
I'm sure many immigrants would be ecstatic to have the opportunity.
I live in a rural town (1 hour+ drive in any drection to the next town) and I could see this being a good thing if implemented correctly. This town isn't equipped for an influx of any people, but has vacant lots that could be turned into a variety of housing. There aren't a lot of jobs, but I would think more people would mean more things could be offered. Potentially great way to invest in rural areas!
Heck yeah! Remember, the alternative would be these immigrants being unable to immigrate to the US!
If they would prefer to stay outside of the US rather than live in rural America, nobody is forcing them to come!
I think we should force you to live in South Dakota, since it needs a little revitalizing.
Seeing two of your comments now, I feel you have a bit of a bee in your bonnet about immigrants being forced to live places?
Care to share more? I don't mean to pre-judge you, I just feel there's more behind your feelings on the matter than I understand yet.
How about, and this might be a little crazy, not forcing people to live somewhere?
You're right. They can just stay in their current nations if they don't want to move to rural America.
I think forcing immigrants to live in bumfuck nowhere places because you like those places is stupid. You don't even have an actual argument for it. I think metal music and manual cars should be more popular, so let's force immigrants to only listen to metal and only drive manual vehicles lol.
Are you also gonna claim that you're pro-freedom and pro-small government while forcing people to live in your backwater hometown?
You still can't comprehend what you are reading and I'm done repeating myself.
Goodbye.
The level of dialog I expect from a hillbilly smh
I was being genuine and said nothing about forcing people. It's an option to consider, but not one you will see when you lack compassion.
I imagine they would; alas it gets a lot more complicated than that.
I'd like to see a renewed love for rural places generally, and especially in the developing world. There's so much potential there that I feel most people don't see.
What better way to open people’s eyes to the beauty of X, than to force X upon them!
Okay I saw this and first thought it was a reply to another thread about XWindows and exTwitter.
I'd like to see a renewed love of rural places - not by forcing people to live there.
But in this thread's hypothetical of immigration to rural parts, there's a difference that it's an invitation: you're invited to come to our country to live in certain areas. It's only "forcing X" if you think you're already entitled to immigrate.
Like, easing immigration for "skilled workers" isn't forcing anyone to be a "skilled worker".
People having to live in certain places aren’t being offered immigration. Immigration means becoming a citizen. Citizens of the United States are free.
That's a fair, and important point, I think. Though I only half agree. Gaining residency also counts as immigration, does it not? At least it's a step in the way to full residency; and those steps do come with a limited freedom.
If you're white