Work Reform

10001 readers

505 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

125

Performance reviews are just employers controlling the narrative when employees are underpaid (hachyderm.io)

submitted 8 months ago by maegul@hachyderm.io to c/workreform@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Performance reviews are just employers controlling the narrative when employees are underpaid

Right?
If you underperform, brutal negotiations ensue … prove your value or the deal is off.

Buuut, if you’re overperforming, you get gold stickers and praise, and the possibility of a pay bump through a process controlled by the employer …

instead of you telling the employer that *they* have to prove their value or the deal is off.

Instead over performing then becomes the expectation.

@workreform

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] maegul@hachyderm.io 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@henfredemars

Yea. Which touches on the issue of who determines the performance score of an employee and how transparent and inclusive it is.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

In every case I've been involved with so far it boils down to arbitrary feelings with only a slight correlation to actual performance. You get a good score if they like you.

So, the system is simply you get a raise based on feelings. Why have the performance reviews? The performance system is used to backdate reasons for the a priori decision if required for legal reasons. It maintains the illusion that there's something to be gained by working harder when that's simply not true.

In such a system, you re-roll bosses until you get one that likes you. Job hop. Move around laterally inside a company. Be a social chameleon. It's much more effective to just ask more women on a date (bosses in this analogy) than to keep trying with the same one because people don't generally change their minds.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

@henfredemars

@workreform @maegul It is really hard to objectively rate people. On an assembly line if you keep up with the line you are as good as everyone else, if you hold the line back are you worse or does the line need redesign? If you are an engineer it can be years before we discover how many mistakes you made. If you are a salesman did you miss your numbers because the economy is bad or because you are bad?