this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
53 points (78.5% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
807 readers
118 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Path of least resistance i guess. I'm always trying to put in the least amount of effort possible on things that don't matter that much to me, and my gender expression is just not something that i really care about anymore so i just go with what is easiest and takes the least amount of maintenance.
As for why straight people exist, i don't know... do they? I used to think so but now I'm not so certain anymore. Nowadays i tend to think that everyone is more or less on a spectrum. Being completely straight seems as impossible to me as reaching absolute zero temperature. You can approach it but never really reach it.
So yeah, in conclusion i think straight people are probably a myth, and the only reason i'm cis is because every other option sounds like too much work.
I don't agree with this one-drop rule for straightness. I have incidentally found men attractive, but at the end of the day, that's the exception: I have found thousands of women attractive for every such incidence. It is disingenuous to call me as bisexual as a result—or at least renders the term meaningless.
Sure, but no one is strictly pure straight.
I don't dispute that, but it doesn't change its usefulness as a metric. I guess the question is where does 'straightness' end and 'bisexuality' begin? I'd argue that a Kinsey 1, for example, is still a straight guy. Labels are less like algebra and more like statistics—there's always a bit of fuzz around the edges, or outliers you need to ignore.
Totally agree, everyone’s gotta be a tiny bit bi, that might explain people being ok cis. Even people who really think they’re straight are probably attracted to some enbies or femboys (who turn everyone gay).