this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
699 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My setup is a Samsung that doesn’t have WiFi setup. It supports HDMI CEC, as does my game console and streaming box, so I basically never touch the TV remote. It’s effectively a dumb monitor.

I mostly stream via my Xbox and AppleTV since they’re performant systems.

[–] Dnn@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s effectively a dumb monitor.

I may be old-fashioned but that's the only thing a TV is supposed to be. You choose how to use it by its periphery.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I know smart TVs get a lot of shit here, but I get the desire to have one remote, no need to configure a universal remote, and no need to manage inputs.

Personally, I think HDMI CEC is the best way to simplify remotes and input management, but I can understand why my folks would not even want to think about external devices and would want to buy one rectangle that has all the things in it already, including an app for their cable channels.

It’s an appealing user experience proposition, but it’s often executed poorly, and creates more e-waste.