this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)
NBA
5095 readers
36 users here now
| East - Atlantic |
|---|
| Boston Celtics |
| Brooklyn Nets |
| New York Knicks |
| Philadelphia Sixers |
| Toronto Raptors |
| East - Central |
|---|
| Chicago Bulls |
| Cleveland Cavaliers |
| Detroit Pistons |
| Indiana Pacers |
| Milwaukee Bucks |
| East - Southeast |
|---|
| Atlanta Hawks |
| Charlotte Hornets |
| Miami Heat |
| Orlando Magic |
| Washington Wizards |
| West - Northwest |
|---|
| Denver Nuggets |
| Minnesota Timberwolves |
| Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Portland Trailblazers |
| Utah Jazz |
| West - Pacific |
|---|
| Golden State Warriors |
| Los Angeles Clippers |
| Los Angeles Lakers |
| Phoenix Suns |
| Sacramento Kings |
| West - Southwest |
|---|
| Dallas Mavericks |
| Houston Rockets |
| Memphis Grizzlies |
| New Orleans Pelicans |
| San Antonio Spurs |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Without arguing over your highly debatable first statement, my biggest issue with the Smart Porzingis trade is with what both players bring to the team.
Porzingis is mediocre on defense and on offense only adds one more player to the "give a scorer the ball and stand outside the 3point line" offense that the Celtics have been unsuccessfully running for years, and on top of they already have Tatum and Brown that are both better than Porzingis in ISOs, so all that he adds is a 3° option to a system that wasn't working with two great ones.
On the other hand no one will argue that Smart is not a good defender and you may say his decision making isn't that good on offense, and I agree with that, but in this last playoffs he was the Cs best playmaker, mostly due to the fact that most of the time he was the only one.
So with that trade they have basically worsened their defense in favor of having a even more static offense which already wasn't working for them.
I really don't think it's that debatable. Potential health and the difference in contracts are the reason they got picks out of the swap, not because they're equivalent players. There's a reason he's a perennial max-ish guy and Smart will never sniff it.
Porzingis is an efficient paint scorer, especially for your third option and with Rob as pure vertical threat. He's not just a catch and shoot guy on offense. He might not be your best scorer, but he's a damn good third option, and he's a great option against a zone team like Miami that wants to push you into taking short-mid range shots without getting to the rim.
Smart is a good defender, but he was far from a special one last year. He wasn't better at the point of attack or on the perimeter than White, and his standout trait defensively last year was that he wasn't a mismatch against bigs. Porzingis isn't a great defender, but he's also not a liability, and swapping him for Smart means you're even bigger while still not having anyone on the court that's easy to blow by. It also means Tatum can play 3 and doesn't have to battle in the paint as much to allow you to get rebounds.
Brad told you they had surplus at guard because they did. They want to play bigger and this lets them do it.