this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
331 points (98.3% liked)

Atheism

4035 readers
324 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 73 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Obviously knows neither the spirit nor the letter of established law...Texas huh? Yeah, that tracks.

[–] Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can't hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

edit: went and looked it up

Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states, "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall anyone be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."

[–] HopingForBetter@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'll gladly acknowledge the existence of a supreme being; my tuxedo cat is very supreme.

...we don't have to say which being is supreme, right?

[–] Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

I like your moxie. You've got my vote.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

By that verbage, claiming to be pastafarian meets those requirments.

Would pay good money to see a official painting of someone with a collander on their head.

[–] Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Technically a Satanist does too.

edit: though you'd have to "really believe"

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can't hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

Just to be clear that's unconstitutional. That law has no force or effect.

Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

[–] Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it's unconstitutional....buuut, the shitty way our political system works, somebody would have to sue to get it removed in Texas. Until someone does, they're going to enforce it.

edit: in Texas

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The text is never going to be removed for sure because that takes action. But also no one is enforcing it either. I'd love to hear about anyone it's been enforced against, if they exist.

[–] Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you think they're not going to fight tooth and nail to enforce it in Texas, you don't know Texas. It would probably have to go to SCOTUS.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I just asked who has been barred from the ballot as a result. I'm aware of Republican candidates raising the issue in TX, only to be informed that it's unconstitutional. To my knowledge, no one has ever been barred since that case. If you have different information please let me know.

If someone were barred, they would sue in federal district court and immediately receive an injunction. Federal courts cannot ignore precedent from SCOTUS.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Texas huh? Yeah, that tracks.

Actually we're our own country and we get to do what we want.