Collapse

3237 readers

6 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.

Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.

RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.

Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

wabooti@lemmy.ml

eleitl@lemmy.ml

doom_and_gloom@lemmy.ml

maketotaldestr0i@lemm.ee

106

Rising water: Quebec lender ending new mortgages in flood zones ’just the beginning’ (montrealgazette.com)

submitted 8 months ago by rinze@infosec.pub to c/collapse@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Desjardins Group announced as of Feb. 1 it would no longer offer new mortgages for properties in “0-20 year” flood zones — where there is a five per cent chance of flooding in any given year — because of what it called the rising effect of climate change.

There are some exceptions: buyers can get financing for up to 65 per cent a home’s selling price if the previous owner had a Desjardins mortgage and the property has protective measures to prevent flooding. But the company’s decision has left mayors of low-lying towns worried that homeowners will be left with properties that no one will buy or that are massively devalued.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Contracts Clause of the Constitution has been interpreted to mean that they cannot. Of course, since SCOTUS have made clear recently that the only thing that matters is what the majority of the sitting bench agree with, they coule overturn their 1977 finding supporting that view... But as of right now, states cannot default on their obligations to creditors, because they cannot do anything "impairing the obligation of contracts."