this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
347 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3926 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boebert had switched districts after Buck announced his impending retirement to avoid a stiff challenge from Democrat Adam Frisch in the 3rd district, but Buck's immediate departure will set up a special election in which the state Republican and Democratic parties will choose a nominee – and there's no guarantee they'll pick the controversial Boebert.

Further complicating matters, Boebert would have to resign her seat in the 3rd district to run in that special election because Colorado law prohibits a candidate from running for more than one office at a time, and her resignation would set up yet another U.S. House special election before the end of the year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 44 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like the guy who was retiring wanted to go out in a way that screwed over Bobo the worst.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It’s just my speculation but I think it was the shit show from the GOP at the SOTU. He had already announced his retirement in November but suddenly changed it to next week after the event. He then made statements about the party having no decorum. I believe he was already done but that was the last straw.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fucking mind boggling that there is any possible last straw after so many years of Donald.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because it was never about decorum or dignity or honorable governance, not really.

It was about gambling that Trump would give them the power they wanted.

He didn't, they lost that gamble, and the longer they hang on to it, the worse it gets for them. Ken Buck isn't quitting because things finally crossed a line of dignity, he's quitting because it's become clear to him that no amount of effort can save this shit show. Might as well do something else.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My guess would be MGT all in red and acting trashy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think one of the funniest lines in that SNL sketch this weekend was when Biden says "thanks for dressing up tonight".

I sure wish the real Biden had said that to her when that harpy was screeching at him.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I highly doubt he put (or was capable of putting) that much thought into it.

I choose to see it as "sometimes the universe has a funny way of working things out"

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

He might have been forced out to encourage a "rising star" to proceed.

That was how wannabe dictator Stephen Harper and his Reform party were done in in 2015 in Canada. They tried to run the old, sane conservatives out of their strongholds in the Maritimes.