this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
1623 points (98.6% liked)

News

23608 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 173 points 9 months ago (5 children)

We need this so fucking bad. As a species, not just America or the wealthy nations only. Everyone.

And this should just be a transitionary period down to a 24 or less hour work week. Fuck slaving away at shit jobs just to make billionaires.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

We need this so fucking bad.

Of course we do, so do the corporations, though they don't realize it. With happier workers you get more profits.

Call your House of Representative member and let them know that.

If we citizens don't apply the pressure, nothing will happen.

And if your cynical about doing that, try it anyway, just as an experiment, to see what happens. Hell, even make a YouTube video about your experience doing so, for content.

Just say "Please let my representative know that I am in favor of the Bernie Sanders bill (Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act) for a 32 hour work week."

It's just a phone call. A 32 hour work week is worth a single phone call, right?

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"but more hours means more productivity %%"

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to go with you forgot to add the /s to your comment.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The quotes provide the same meaning, basically that you are parodying the other side.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Quotes are usually reserved for actually quoting someone else (for example), and not making a statement about parodying the other side.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's a pretty commonly used format on many parts of the internet, I think most people would interpret it that way, especially when everybody reading will see that what is being quoted is obviously untrue.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Well I guess I'm being nuanced here, but I don't think in this specific case that works out that way, considering what it's replying to.

In other words I would agree with your interpretation if the reply was parodying something I said directly. Otherwise it just seems something of a non sequitur.

Anyway, I get what you're trying to communicate towards me, I even agree that sometimes it is using the way you describe. I would just think that's done the minority of the time, and the majority of the time quotes are used to actually quote someone.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I felt like "/s" gives the "joke" away so I opted not to have it and have people actually think critically, especially since the statement is false.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Do you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.

Fair enough, and that's the answer I was looking for.

The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you're right, it could match the first sentence, I guess.

I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a cynical statement, lighten up

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

lighten up

Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur.

Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I think if it was intended to quote someone they would put who they were quoting. Otherwise there's not really a point.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So you’ve never read fiction?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, in all the decades I've been on this planet, I've never read one book of fiction of any type whatsoever.

/s

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

https://youtu.be/00npeUY_1Vg?si=rPbXUkUQjnLQb0ea

Don't get me wrong, I love me some Futurama, but you're going to have to elaborate on this reply, and how it relates to my comment about contacting your house representative.

"I don't miss twice Campers."

I loved that line.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I was jokingly suggesting that unhappy workers are actually more productive but in reality I'm 100% with you.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good idea. I have one little suggestion. Start the conversation with "Fuck Milton Friedman, and fuck your shares."

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When COVID shut down my state (we were considered essential) we got furloughed one day a week. I was getting paid less so I was concerned, but it was honestly the best thing to happen to me. We started a garden, I got so much more done. I was healthier and happier.

Going back to 5 days a week, and longer commute (no more COVID clear freeways), I can absolutely feel my life shortening. I've gained a ton of weight, and increased stress significantly.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago

Upvote because I am Satan and I want you to suffer! /s

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yea, slaving away should be purely optional. If you love your job or you love money or you want to keep yourself distracted AND make money at the same time, by all means, knock yourself out and work 60 hour weeks.

It's a failure of the system if people have to work full time to scrape by with the very bare necessities and live in poverty, with all the nasties that come with it. America coined the term "working poor" (obligatory meme so we're on the same page)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Full Employment and Zero Protests go hand-in-hand.

As soon as unemployment figures start climbing (2008, 2014, 2016, COVID-2020) people hit the streets and cops start working a lot of extra overtime.

Imagine if people had a whole third weekend day to themselves. Imagine what they could spend their time doing that wasn't entirely predicated on enriching their bosses?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Imagine citizens actually learning how politics work and taking civic responsibilities for their own interests, instead of being chained to a job for every waking moment, and so zombified they don't even know what day of the week it is.

Happy people with stake in their own community. What a nightmare for the ownership class!

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

America coined the term “working poor” (obligatory meme so we’re on the same page)

It's also very American to just fucking ignore most of the world while saying things like that.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 9 months ago

Are you saying that the term "working poor" was coined in another country?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Looking at the productivity gains, vs income gains since 1970, I would say that we need an 8 hour work week. We are producing well over 7 times as much stuff and economic value as we were in 1970

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We should produce less stuff.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The amount of shit that companies produce and then just throw away because it's cheaper than donating, is staggering. There was some report a while back about Amazon doing this. Truckloads of stuff that doesn't sell, brand new, straight to the landfill. Stuff that could be donated to public schools or whatever. Fucking gross.

Not to mention all the food we produce, then waste.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is on third party sellers. They have to pay for warehouse space after a certain amount of time. If something isn't selling they can pay for Amazon to ship it back or destroy it. Most sellers don't actually have a warehouse themselves, they have their products shipped directly from the manufacturer to an Amazon warehouse.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but I honestly don't care much about the logistics or details of why. The underlying concept is the unnecessary waste. Whatever the reason it's happening, I disagree with it.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

Agreed. The problem is a business like Amazon getting SO INCREDIBLY MASSIVE and yet completely neglecting the obvious problems with "Eh just destroy perfectly good stuff" being the easiest, most convenient option.

Heck, they're so evil I'm surprised they don't just have a ToS that says "We sell it ourselves if you don't wanna store it and don't want it returned."

But nah, filling landfills with wrecked computers, batteries, and plastics is so much more convenient this quarter /s.

They (amazon) need to be destroyed. We don't want to store them here anymore.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

A relative of mine used to work at a private school. The owner of the place wanted to throw an extra computer monitor in the trash. Literally just put it in the dumpster. That relative saved the monitor and now I am using it. Bought a DVI to HDMI cable and it works great. It's a 1680x1050 situash.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Agreed. The waste factor is appalling

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

vs income gains since 1970

I hope you do correct for inflation.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

that's because America shits billionaires.