41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
41 points (84.7% liked)
The Legend of Zelda
3635 readers
7 users here now
A community for everything related to The Legend of Zelda franchise!
Rules:
-
- Be a decent human being.
-
- Fanart must be credited.
-
- No untagged spoilers of new games.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I wasn't yet alive when SNES Zelda was new, so I didn't grow up with, but I would still consider it a "traditional Zelda" just like I consider ocarina and majora, and wind waker, twilight, to be "traditional".
Change can be good, but to me, the changes in the new Zelda games are huge and divisive. Sometimes it seems like it took pages from other companies open world games, and lost some of the magic it had.
Or maybe I'm just getting old and bitter lol.
Majora as traditional is a spicy take and I love it
Haha ok, true. It's my favorite, guilty bias on my part. I feel like it wasn't too much of a change from Ocarina though.
Having a built in time limit precludes it from being a "traditional" Zelda, in my opinion. Not that that's bad, necessarily, but it's the only one like that.
@frozen @GreenCrush but the time limit is only a facade. Being able to freely move back and forth in time kind of negates the time limit, no? You get the ability to do so very early game
And
That’s an interesting combination there. Time for me to turn into dust and mold 👴🏻💀👻
But seriously, this shows that what anything is, definitively, changes over time. Nostalgia not only cling to the past, not only cling to a singularly myopic version of the past, but actually clings to a version of the past that never truly existed.
Ha fair point.