159
submitted 6 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The geneticist Jim Wilson, at the University of Edinburgh, was shocked by the frequency he found in the U.K. Biobank, an anonymized research database: One in 7,000 people, according to his unpublished analysis, was born to parents who were first-degree relatives—a brother and a sister or a parent and a child. “That’s way, way more than I think many people would ever imagine,” he told me. And this number is just a floor: It reflects only the cases that resulted in pregnancy, that did not end in miscarriage or abortion, and that led to the birth of a child who grew into an adult who volunteered for a research study.

Most of the people affected may never know about their parentage, but these days, many are stumbling into the truth after AncestryDNA and 23andMe tests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

I’ve been thinking it’s pretty common for a while, just because of how common a version of it with plausible deniability for the downsides (step siblings, etc.) is in porn. I know people say it’s just to appeal to people who really like it and the rest can just mute, but that’s very unconvincing. I always have porn muted, because the sounds don’t do much for me and just about every person I talk to about this (not a lot, so grain of salt) is surprised that anyone would mute as a rule. Secondly, I don’t think you really need words to pick up on the incest vibe.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Wait, there are people who don’t mute?

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

My theory about all the step sibling porn is that they’re trying to get you to pay for the “normal” porn. “Yes you can watch it for free…but wouldn’t it be better if it wasn’t so weird?” I don’t think most people find those story lines appealing.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sibling or other incestuous roleplay is super common actually. The step sibling stuff on porn sites afaik was once again enforced from their payment providers or advertisers. Because people who aren't related, but acting like they are, are apparently turning the world into Sodom & Gomorrah, and based on some of those weird virgin or conspiracytard comments here it seems that some people actually do believe this too.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I think the idea is that step porn is basically just normal porn past the first few opening lines.

Normal people will just skip that bit and watch.

People into incest will watch the first few lines.

Unfortunately, I think a lot of porn makers have tried to split the baby and ended up alienating both audiences. People into incest don't like the whole "step" thing, because it's not real incest. And people who don't like incest don't like the "step" thing, because it's too close to real incest.

Essentially, I think porn producers think it's a moneymaker, but it's really just bad porn production.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Incest porn is so disgusting. I don't care if it's fictional, it's still disgusting.

I have no problem with porn in general, but I'm just glad I don't know who gets off on the incest porn.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago

It’s 100% not my thing, but, y’know, neither is scat. I’m just assuming someone likes it because it’s everywhere. Another user suggested it’s to get people to pay for non-incest porn, which sounds possible, though the porn companies would have to be willing to collude about that. I’m not sure if that’s likelier than that people are just ashamed about it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I think a third option is that porn companies think it's what people want whether it is or not and people consume it because it's oversaturated the market.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Or a 4th option. It's just lazy low cost plot writing.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

That’s possible, though I gotta assume they use tracking. Actually, I wonder if it’s just as common outside of private mode

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Good question. If you're really into incest porn, you might be inclined to do your best to hide it.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, I just use a private window as a matter of course because I use the auto complete for common websites and I don’t want anything untoward showing up if I’m looking something up in front of people. I gotta assume that’s pretty common, no matter what people are into.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, the bigger problem is when people think a private window does more than forget their search history and cookies on their device

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
159 points (94.9% liked)

News

22895 readers
3704 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS