this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
418 points (100.0% liked)

196

17034 readers
1737 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

It’s not a law of maths in the way that 1+1=2 is a law

Yes it is, literally! The Distributive Law, and Terms. Also 1+1=2 isn't a Law, but a definition.

So 1/2x is universally interpreted as 1/(2x)

Correct, Terms - ab=(axb).

people doing academic research in maths, not primary school teachers

Don't ask either - this is actually taught in Year 7.

if they realise it’s over a question like this they’ll probably end up saying “it’s deliberately ambiguous in an attempt to start arguments”

The university people, who've forgotten the rules of Maths, certainly say that, but I doubt Primary School teachers would say that - they teach the first stage of order of operations, without coefficients, then high school teachers teach how to do brackets with coefficients (The Distributive Law).