this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
353 points (99.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers
372 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 46 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Now I need to consider Gitea and Codeberg. Thanks for the reminder GitLab.

[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 78 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Don't use Gitea, use Forgejo - it's a hard fork of Gitea after Gitea became a for-profit venture (and started gating their features behind a paywall).

Codeberg has switched to Forgejo as well.

Also, there's some promising progress being made towards ActivityPub federation in Forgejo! Imagine a world where you can comment on issues and send/receive pull requests on other people's projects, all from the comfort of a small homeserver.

[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

ActivityPub integration on git remote repos sounds very interesting. Thanks for sharing that, I'll definetely take a look at Codeberg/Forgejo.

[–] Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 8 months ago

Can't wait for forge federation, it's super annoying that I need an account for each individual instance just to report a bug

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 5 points 8 months ago

From here:

  • SAML
  • Branch protection for organizations
  • Dependency scanning (yes, there are other tools for this, but it's still a feature the open source version doesn't get).
  • Additional security controls for users (IP allowlisting, mandatory MFA)
  • Audit logging
[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

None?

If you need action runners you have to ask for them which is fair as it's expensive.

If you self host it's all free.

[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This sadly isn't true anymore - they now have Gitea Enterprise, which contains additional features not available in the open source version.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think we were talking about Forego, but now I'm not sure.

To be clear Forego is what I was stating didn't have pay walled features. I know Enterprise auth works, but I haven't used the others yet.

[–] rho50@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 months ago

Ohh, my bad! I thought the person you were replying to was asking about Gitea. Yeah, Forgejo seems truly free and also looks like it has a strong governance structure that is likely to keep things that way.

[–] zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

radicle.xyz checks those boxes, but it's gossip protocol, not activitypub.

Still cool, though.

[–] CuteistFox@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It does, but it's a little obtuse to use.

[–] CuteistFox@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

oh it must of benn a new update

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They're required to take down content following a DMCA takedown request. It's up to the uploader to counterclaim if they're so inclined, at which point they're able to put it back up.

[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

codeberg also removes piracy related projects... gitea is certainly an option tho

[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Self-hosting Forgejo is a way to go.

[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

That's great, it seems like Suyu is taking this seriously and actually wants to continue development of the emulator. Many forks of yuzu just look like reuploads of the original repo with no new commits.