this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
186 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
2693 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

~~I think whoever wrote it just used the wrong word because yes inertia is dependent on mass, not momentum~~

Okay I actually decided to check and I think it just a poorly written explanation of rotational inertia

A rotating spheroid will oblate when its centrifugal force generates enough ~~inertia~~ angular momentum to slightly flatten it out into a more irregular, elliptical shape.

If the shape also changes, this would mean distribution of that mass relative to the axis of rotation would also have changed, which if I'm reading this right, affects rotational inertia.

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Thank you! I knew I wasn't crazy... ๐Ÿ˜ฌ