27
[Question] Why didn't infantry tanks work? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 7 months ago by TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca to c/history@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems to me that in the interwar period there were a lot of tanks designed with the idea that they would stay with groups of infantry, providing direct fire support while being a lot more durable than a field gun. My understanding is that this was generally abandoned in favour of faster tanks which operated somewhat independently of infantry. But to my very limited knowledge, the infantry tank seems to make sense. What were the theory's disadvantages? (Or is my understanding flawed?)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

When they develop the tank jet it's game over

[-] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It's called the A-10

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

History

4282 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to History!

This community is dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE WELL: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban for a period of time determined by the moderator who bans you.

  1. Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Please encourage discussion whenever possible.

  2. No memes. No ads. No promos. No spam.

  3. No porn.

  4. We like facts and reliable sources here. Don't spread misinformation or try to change the historical record.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
forensic_potato@lemmy.world
zoidsberg@lemmy.world